“There is a prevailing theoretical poverty within the US revolutionary movement on a wide variety of subjects (party reconstitution, national question, women’s question, LGBT question, labor question, etc.), in large part due to the extensive and damaging legacy of revisionism within the US movement. It was our country, mostly due to the central role our country plays in the imperialist system, which has spawned some of the most rank revisionists in the International Communist Movement such as Avakian, Browder, etc. Given this reality, many comrades recognize the profound need for theoretical work and seek to rectify our theoretical poverty with original analyses and theses. However, there are obviously correct and incorrect ways to go about this endeavor, and so we wanted to write this article, taking into account our experience in establishing and running our current publication and drawing from the production of the current wave of US Maoist movement, to advance a few key questions and ideas that will better structure our movement’s ideological-political struggle for unity.”

Read the full article by clicking here.